Standard Agreement For The Sale Of Real Estate

Festivals in March 2007 on Apocalypto

get away from everyday life and enjoy good events in March.

• On Friday March 2 Eurojazz festival begins 2007 in Mexico. Its headquarters at the National Arts Centre ( CENART ), located in Rio Churubusco corner of Calzada de Tlalpan. They can drive by Rio Churubusco eastern direction or Calzada de Tlalpan north and join Rio Churubusco. The nearest metro is General Anaya, Line 2. The card still have not found on the net but can review pages Horizonte CENART or 108. Admission is free, what better to hear a nice jazz.

• 4 It is presenting the Festival of Contemporary Cinema Mexico City ( FICCO ) from 21 February to 4 March, so there is still a chance to go.

• is about to begin twenty-third edition of the Festival of Mexico in the Historic Center . 15 to 31 March will take place in several of the amazing places located in the heart of Mexico City. Are events of national and international music, theater, dance and visual arts, among others.

Curtain Rods Door Frame

Ha habido gran cantidad de críticas hacía la última película de Mel Gibson, Apocalypto . Se discute sobre cómo presenta a la civilización maya y si Mel quiso hacer un film para mostrar un poco sobre la historia de una de las culturas mesoamericanas precolombinas o un film que vendiera sin importar en absoluto la historia de la misma.

En la mayoría de los comentarios que he visto en la internet, la película es fuertemente criticada. Y no es que no me quiera quedar atrás, pero pues quiero dar mi punto de vista. Un punto de vista simple.

Como seguramente hay algunos que no la han visto try not to mention about the part where the UFO appears and fucks everyone but the English.

The criticism I've seen can be divided into good and bad (almost no regular). Technically, the movie is good, you can not expect less of a Hollywood production (although the scene where they burn the huts is very poor, how strange that the fire does not spread and maintained in a line, the tanks are almost gas, haha). Environmentally, we should make an assessment of the effect on natural resources where they filmed, the production of this type involves hundreds of thousands of people who not only come, film and go. Historically, very bad. Apocalypto has many historical inconsistencies, for example, the average height of the Maya was 1.50 m (and big heads) and in the film we see Maya sucked tall and well, if that were true, I would measure six feet and out mister world ( and not be so stubborn, xD), the Maya practiced the grave and not (sic) composting (using organic material to fertilize naturally) human as shown in an impressive scene of the film.

Francisco Rosado May says apocalypto is not for people ready and critical mind ( a ) , and it is true, because then you do not understand the movie, you spend doing tantrums. Nevertheless, the film brings a good message: mastering the fears and confront them, but Mel has invented the Mayan rambo, says Colin Ricardo Pacheco in his note ( 2 ) . Apocalypto is one of those movies that cause so much controversy to break sales records. It is a formula commonly used and very efficient. I saw Christ's passion, but I remember how of Father Amaro was strongly criticized by the church, and what this sold?

Initially yes I was somewhat annoyed and angry because I do think it is exaggerated and distorted the concept that was quite the sacrifice for our ancestors, plus it just shows that. Omitted too many contributions made by the Maya to the human species. They were good farmers, architects, invented the zero, and so on. All this is not even mentioned in the movie and then just go to a bloodthirsty Mayans.

The Hollywood movie is just not pretend to see a documentary film produced by them, the United States has no culture, the little that they had cornered to extinguish (RGA) So do not expect that strives to teach the world about the cultures of other places. But I think it should require producers, directors, writers, etc. clarify it, especially if these films will be presented in such countries as Mexico, where the average book reading is a week (yes, the book weekly , those novels that sell 5 pesos newsstands), in countries where the culture and history are not a priority for its population.

So I join the writer Jorge Miguel Cocom Pech Mayan ( 3 ) , many countrymen and descendants Maya. Mel Gibson should clarify who would not represent the Mayan civilization in his film, which only took as a basis for filing a Hollywood formula. If not, then must apologize for the strain that has caused in our culture.

And to conclude I throw a phrase that would be good for promotional Gandhi: If you want to learn history, not read, better run Hollywood movies . Not true, you have to read!, At least wikipedia, lol, here we discuss the articles. I send you a hug and leave you more links with more criticism: ( 4 ) (5 ) ( 6) (7 ) ( 8) (9 ).

Guatsa Steppenwolf

What's The Name Of The Huge Guy In Troy

Forms of your being

I am preparing a post about Mel Gibson's Apocalypto, but now I'm doing as I work and because I have not had time to finish ( and started, and put the title on apocalypto , lol).

At the moment I would like to share something that came out of me in one of those moments when melancholy comes over me and I take; because in that moment my heart pump blood well, I'm also pumped words that seem to make some sense (at least for me).

Forms of your being

Drawing: http://www.siporcuba.it/cc-qua-sandra.htm

I know about this great and deep feeling that sometimes makes me dizzy. I do not intend to talk about my wrongs, I just want you to look inside myself. I know your face, just imagine it. I have not heard your voice, only imagine. Not what I would do if he had no imagination. Maybe not love, do not see, do not listen. You're part of me because of me you're born. You're born to see the world. This world is full of oddities. You turn, you know all sorts of people, you will all sorts of places; 've swum in the ocean, how deep is it?;'ve flown on top of the sky, how far is it? But back to me, but you make it beautiful and fair than when you left. I would like to give shape to touch you, caress your face. I would like to give voice to listen to your words, and come to the place of your birth, and establish a connection between reality and imagination. I wish I could look into your eyes and tell you how beautiful you look. Could hold you, feel you, smell you, admire you, love you. What do you do like it did back in? I do not know. I only know that when I get to supplement my life. Keep waiting to come back to form, with voice, with a look that caught me and took me to where only you can do it. I know you will. I will keep fighting to overcome the fear that someday wither the place you saw the birth many times.

3/May/06

Guatsa Steppenwolf

Softball Quotes About Pitchers

Speaking of global warming, the human species and some of his characters

According to Nobel chemistry laureate Mario Molina, taking action to slow climate change would cost about 1% of production in the planeta. Esto sin duda alguna significa una gran inversión, es cierto. Pero es tan grande como efectiva, porque en caso de no hacerse en un corto plazo, los costos futuros incrementarán, también menciona el Nóbel, hasta un 20 o 30% de la producción en el planeta.

Tal parece que aún quedaba duda de que el calentamiento global es en gran proporción (90% ahora confirmado) atribuido a las actividades del ser(do) humano. Quiero aquí citar un fragmento del gran escritor alemán Hermann Hesse en El Lobo Estepario , una de sus mejores obras: “… acaso toda la vida humana no sea sino un tremendo error, un aborto violento y desgraciado of the universal mother, a wild and terribly unfortunate test of nature. . " Therefore think that we are not guilty of such an event is to evade our responsibilities is to continue blinding to the realities that every day we met, is to account to the statement quoted above.

... a wild and terribly unfortunate test of nature ... Terribly unfortunate is the result of a capitalist model applied in much of the planet. A wild trial is to have "leaders" without a minimum of environmental awareness. A wild and terribly unfortunate trial in the USA, who cares little and does not sign the protocol Kyoto. As is a huge mistake to have left in Mexico will govern pure sellout every day people are most separates Mexico from Latin America to feel like a first world country.

And yet they are terribly criticized those who do not think like the capitalist countries. A Fidel Castro has been discredited by the model remains in Cuba, has been called a dictator and the devil. But what was curious when I heard the comment made by Fidel when, during the visit that made Hugo Chavez, he read an article that mentions that the World Health Organization cautions that climate change also endangers health. And then you see two people, unwelcome in the capitalist system, concerned about the health of the human species. And do not go that far, Cuba is one of the most developed countries in medicine and is also home to great athletes.

This is where there is room to another part of the excerpt from the book: " ... man is not only reasonable means an animal, but a child of the gods and destined for immortality. "A salute to those men who in their deeds immortalized his image and gave birth to ideologies of equity.

In the natural, political and social "Until victory always"

Guatsa Steppenwolf

Read Online Doujinshi

BRIC is written without M

This is the title of an article published in the conference on Wednesday January 31 by Alejandro Nadal COLMEX member and coordinator of the program on Science, Technology and Development from the same school.

This article indicates the ineptitude and ignorance of our "Mr." President Felipe Calderon, or fecal incontinence, which is the same.

How long will our leaders stop be submissive?. Enough! put aside their interests and hypocrisy and start to really worry about the people as they say it.

http://www.jornada.unam.mx / 2007/01/31/index.php? section = opinion & article = 025a1eco

BRIC M is written without

By Alejandro Nadal

In 2003, the brokerage Goldman Sachs published a study on the future of the global economy in which he made reference to four countries Key: Brazil, Russia, India and China. The main thesis was that by 2050 these nations would be dominant powers and eclipse the rich economies of today. From this came the acronym BRIC to designate these four countries.

The basic premise of the report is that in four decades, the BRIC will have a leading role in finance, commerce, industry, science and technology worldwide. Its gross domestic product will be about $ 15 billion (calculated at purchasing power parity), magnitude greater than the GDP of the current G6 (U.S., Japan, Germany, France, England and Italy). According to these projections, each of the members of the BRIC economies would leave behind the G6, except the U.S. (which would only be surpassed by China in 2045).

During his visit to Davos, Felipe Calderón discovered the BRIC. And in a fit dared to suggest that from now on, the acronym BRIC M should include Mexico. But among the parade and the reality is a chasm: the voluntarism of Calderón is matched only by his ignorance of the mathematical model underlying the projections of the study by Goldman Sachs.

Is the Mexican economy comparable to that of members BRIC? By far the answer is negative. To begin, the Goldman Sachs projections rest on a basic premise: the BRIC must maintain institutions and pro-growth policies throughout the entire period. The conditions may change, but the support of the BRICs to the components of education and science must be constant. In Mexico it is the reverse: the per capita spending on education has had a pathetic performance for 20 years and the 2007 budget presented by Calderon announces changes.

For Goldman Sachs macroeconomic stability is important, but not the endogenous scientific and technological effort BRIC will not get far. In these countries, institutions for scientific and technological development are endogenous long history. Russia and China in the background are in their centrally planned economies.

India and Brazil are case apart. The subcontinent has always had centers of scientific and technological important. The nuclear industry in this country is not an isolated case and there are examples in almost all branches of economic activity from agriculture to automotive and machine tools.

For its part, Brazil has always protected the base Mexico lost industrial past two decades. The machine tool industry, to take one example, strengthened and diversified in the years that our country gave all the NAFTA maquiladora project. Brazil also learned to care for their public research centers have been key to grow and absorb foreign technology. The Mexican government destroys them. Today Brazil has the technology of oil exploration at great depths that Mexico did not develop because years ago the government preferred to suffocate the Mexican Petroleum Institute.

The BRIC is a common denominator: the state is key to the acquisition of endogenous scientific and technological capabilities. So excels in critical industries for growth: from aerospace to industrial machinery and equipment, pharmaceutical, and electronics.

The private sector in India and Brazil also was important, but subsidies, credit and protection were the seedbed in which private companies fruition. In Brazil has the third largest aviation aircraft manufacturer in the world, but Embraer began as a state company and whether it could consolidate in the market for passenger planes to feeder routes was because the Brazilian government gave in years the domestic market.

In Brazil and India, the defense of companies in intellectual property meant fierce battles in the World Trade Organization. If these two countries have embraced the WTO TRIPs, as Mexico did in the glorious days of the Secofi, the pharmaceutical industry would be on the floor.

The Goldman Sachs report is misleading. Members of BRICs did everything that the Washington Consensus conviction. Mexico, however, followed the prescriptions of neo-liberalism and not only dismantled their industry, but left the science and technology sector. The policies of Salinas and Zedillo, who so praised Calderon in Davos flattery implies resignation to acquire endogenous scientific and technological capacity.

A Calderon voluntarism with icons like the military. That reminds me of Benito Mussolini once said that all that was needed to transform Italy was will. But no, intelligence is also required not to end up in the dustbin of history. Of course, Mussolini M. Like it or not in Los Pinos, BRIC is written without M.